Jonathan Lalou's blog

Posts Tagged ‘Devoxx’

At Devoxx France 2024, held in April at the Palais des Congrès in Paris, Jean-Philippe Baconnais and Lise Quesnel, consultants at Zenika, presented a 30-minute talk titled Renovate/Dependabot, ou comment reprendre le contrôle sur la mise à jour de ses dépendances. The session explored how tools like Dependabot and Renovate automate dependency updates, reducing the tedious and error-prone manual process. Through a demo and lessons from open-source and client projects, they shared practical tips for implementing Renovate, highlighting its benefits and pitfalls. 🚀

The Pain of Dependency Updates

The talk opened with a relatable skit: Lise, working on a side project (a simple Angular 6 app showcasing women in tech), admitted to neglecting updates due to the effort involved. Jean-Philippe emphasized that this is a common issue across projects, especially in microservice architectures with numerous components. Updating dependencies is critical for:

• Security: Applying patches to reduce exploitable vulnerabilities.
• Features: Accessing new functionalities.
• Bug Fixes: Benefiting from the latest corrections.
• Performance: Leveraging optimizations.
• Attractiveness: Using modern tech stacks (e.g., Node 20 vs. Node 8) to appeal to developers.

However, the process is tedious, repetitive, and complex due to transitive dependencies (e.g., a median of 683 for NPM projects) and cascading updates, where one update triggers others.

Automating with Dependabot and Renovate

Dependabot (acquired by GitHub) and Renovate (from Mend) address this by scanning project files (e.g., package.json, Maven POM, Dockerfiles) and opening pull requests (PRs) or merge requests (MRs) for available updates. These tools:

• Check registries (NPM, Maven Central, Docker Hub) for new versions.
• Provide visibility into dependency status.
• Save time by automating version checks, especially in microservice setups.
• Enhance reactivity, critical for applying security patches quickly.

Setting Up the Tools

Dependabot: Configured via a dependabot.yml file, specifying ecosystems (e.g., NPM), directories, and update schedules (e.g., weekly). On GitHub, it integrates natively via project settings. GitLab users can use a similar approach.

# dependabot.yml
version: 2
updates:
  - package-ecosystem: "npm"
    directory: "/"
    schedule:
      interval: "weekly"

Renovate: Configured via a renovate.json file, extending default presets. It supports GitHub and GitLab via apps or CI/CD pipelines (e.g., GitLab CI with a Docker image). For self-hosted setups, Renovate can run as a Docker container or Kubernetes CronJob.

# renovate.json
{
  "extends": [
    "config:recommended"
  ]
}

In their demo, Jean-Philippe and Lise showcased Renovate on a GitLab project, using a .gitlab-ci.yml pipeline to run Renovate on a schedule, creating MRs for updates like rxjs (from 6.3.2 to 6.6.7).

Customizing Renovate

Renovate’s strength lies in its flexibility through presets and custom configurations:

• Presets: Predefined rules (e.g., npm:unpublishSafe waits 3 days before proposing updates). Presets can extend others, forming a hierarchy (e.g., config:recommended extends base presets).
• Custom Presets: Organizations can define reusable configs in a dedicated repository (e.g., renovate-config) and apply them across projects.

// renovate-config/default.json
{
  "extends": [
    "config:recommended",
    ":npm"
  ]
}

• Grouping Updates: Combine related updates (e.g., all ESLint packages) using packageRules or presets like group:recommendedLinters to reduce PR noise.

{
  "packageRules": [
    {
      "matchPackagePatterns": ["^eslint"],
      "groupName": "eslint packages"
    }
  ]
}

• Dependency Dashboard: An issue tracking open, rate-limited, or ignored MRs, activated via the dependencyDashboard field or preset.

Going Further: Automerge and Beyond

To streamline updates, Renovate supports automerge, automatically merging MRs if the pipeline passes, relying on robust tests. Options include:

• automerge: true for all updates.
• automergeType: "pr" or strategy for specific behaviors.
• Presets like automerge:patch for patch updates only.

The demo showed an automerged rxjs update, triggering a new release (v1.2.1) via semantic-release, tagged, and deployed to Google Cloud Run. A failed Angular update (due to a major version gap) demonstrated how failing tests block automerge, ensuring safety.

Renovate can also update itself and its configuration (e.g., deprecated fields) via the config:migration preset, creating MRs for self-updates.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

From their experiences, Jean-Philippe and Lise shared key tips:

• Manage PR Overload: Limit concurrent PRs (e.g., prConcurrentLimit: 5) and group related updates to reduce noise.
• Use Schedules: Run Renovate at off-peak times (e.g., nightly) to avoid overloading CI runners and impacting production deployments.
• Ensure Robust Tests: Automerge relies on trustworthy tests; weak test coverage can lead to broken builds.
• Balance Frequency: Frequent runs catch updates quickly but risk conflicts; infrequent runs may miss critical patches.
• Monitor Resource Usage: Excessive pipelines can strain runners and increase costs in autoscaling environments (e.g., cloud platforms).
• Handle Transitive Dependencies: Renovate manages them like direct dependencies, but cascading updates require careful review.
• Support Diverse Ecosystems: Renovate works well with Java (e.g., Spring Boot, Quarkus), Scala, and NPM, with grouping to manage high-dependency ecosystems like NPM.
• Internal Repositories: Configure Renovate to scan private registries by specifying URLs.
• Major Updates: Use presets to stage major updates incrementally, avoiding risky automerge for breaking changes.

Takeaways

Jean-Philippe and Lise’s talk highlighted how Dependabot and Renovate transform dependency management from a chore to a streamlined process. Their demo and practical advice showed how Renovate’s flexibility—via presets, automerge, and dashboards—empowers teams to stay secure and up-to-date, especially in complex microservice environments. However, success requires careful configuration, robust testing, and resource management to avoid overwhelming teams or infrastructure. 🌟

Introduction

In a recent presentation, Hervé Boutemy, a veteran Maven maintainer, Apache Software Foundation member, and Solution Architect at Sonatype, delivered a compelling talk on reproducible builds with Apache Maven. With over 20 years of experience in Java, CI/CD, DevOps, and software supply chain security, Hervé shared his five-year journey to make Maven builds reproducible, a critical practice for achieving the highest level of trust in software, as defined by SLSA Level 4. This post dives into the key concepts, practical steps, and surprising benefits of reproducible builds, based on Hervé’s insights and hands-on demonstrations.

What Are Reproducible Builds?

Reproducible builds ensure that compiling the same source code, with the same environment and build tools, produces identical binaries, byte-for-byte. This practice verifies that the distributed binary matches the source code, eliminating risks like malicious tampering or unintended changes. Hervé highlighted the infamous XZ incident, where discrepancies between source tarballs and Git repositories went unnoticed—reproducible builds could have caught this by ensuring the binary matched the expected source.

Originally pioneered by Linux distributions like Debian in 2013, reproducible builds have gained traction in the Java ecosystem. Hervé’s work has led to over 2,000 verified reproducible releases from 500+ open-source projects on Maven Central, with stats growing weekly.

Why Reproducible Builds Matter

Reproducible builds are primarily about security. They allow anyone to rebuild a project and confirm that the binary hasn’t been compromised (e.g., no backdoors or “foireux” additions, as Hervé humorously put it). But Hervé’s five-year experience revealed additional benefits:

• Build Validation: Ensure patches or modifications don’t introduce unintended changes. A “build successful” message doesn’t guarantee the binary is correct—reproducible builds do.
• Data Leak Prevention: Hervé found sensitive data (e.g., usernames, machine names, even a PGP passphrase!) embedded in Maven Central artifacts, exposing personal or organizational details.
• Enterprise Trust: When outsourcing development, reproducible builds verify that a vendor’s binary matches the provided source, saving time and reducing risk.
• Build Efficiency: Reproducible builds enable caching optimizations, improving build performance.

These benefits extend beyond security, making reproducible builds a powerful tool for developers, enterprises, and open-source communities.

Implementing Reproducible Builds with Maven

Hervé outlined a practical workflow to achieve reproducible builds, demonstrated through his open-source project, reproducible-central, which includes scripts and rebuild recipes for 3,500+ compilations across 627+ projects. Here’s how to make your Maven builds reproducible:

Step 1: Rebuild and Verify

Start by rebuilding a project from its source (e.g., a Git repository tag) and comparing the output binary to a reference (e.g., Maven Central or an internal repository). Hervé’s rebuild.sh script automates this:

• Specify the Environment: Define the JDK (e.g., JDK 8 or 17), OS (Windows, Linux, FreeBSD), and Maven command (e.g., mvn clean verify -DskipTests).
• Use Docker: The script creates a Docker image with the exact environment (JDK, OS, Maven version) to ensure consistency.
• Compare Binaries: The script downloads the reference binary and checks if the rebuilt binary matches, reporting success or failure.

Hervé demonstrated this with the Maven Javadoc Plugin (version 3.5.0), showing a 100% reproducible build when the environment matched the original (e.g., JDK 8 on Windows).

Step 2: Diagnose Differences

If the binaries don’t match, use diffoscope, a tool from the Linux reproducible builds community, to analyze differences. Diffoscope compares archives (e.g., JARs), nested archives, and even disassembles bytecode to pinpoint issues like:

• Timestamps: JARs include file timestamps, which vary by build time.
• File Order: ZIP-based JARs don’t guarantee consistent file ordering.
• Bytecode Variations: Different JDK major versions produce different bytecode, even for the same target (e.g., targeting Java 8 with JDK 17 vs. JDK 8).
• Permissions: File permissions (e.g., group write access) differ across environments.

Hervé showed a case where a build failed due to a JDK mismatch (JDK 11 vs. JDK 8), which diffoscope revealed through bytecode differences.

Step 3: Configure Maven for Reproducibility

To make builds reproducible, address common sources of “noise” in Maven projects:

• Fix Timestamps: Set a consistent timestamp using the project.build.outputTimestamp property, managed by the Maven Release or Versions plugins. This ensures JARs have identical timestamps across builds.
• Upgrade Plugins: Many Maven plugins historically introduced variability (e.g., random timestamps or environment-specific data). Hervé contributed fixes to numerous plugins, and his artifact:check-buildplan goal identifies outdated plugins, suggesting upgrades to reproducible versions.
• Avoid Non-Reproducible Outputs: Skip Javadoc generation (highly variable) and GPG signing (non-reproducible by design) during verification.

For example, Hervé explained that configuring project.build.outputTimestamp and upgrading plugins eliminated timestamp and file-order issues in JARs, making builds reproducible.

Step 4: Test Locally

Before scaling, test reproducibility locally using mvn verify (not install, which pollutes the local repository). The artifact:compare goal compares your build output to a reference binary (e.g., from Maven Central or an internal repository). For internal projects, specify your repository URL as a parameter.

To test without a remote repository, build twice locally: run mvn install for the first build, then mvn verify for the second, comparing the results. This catches issues like unfixed dates or environment-specific data.

Step 5: Scale and Report

For large-scale verification, adapt Hervé’s reproducible-central scripts to your internal repository. These scripts generate reports with group IDs, artifact IDs, and reproducibility scores, helping track progress across releases. Hervé’s stats (e.g., 100% reproducibility for some projects, partial for others) provide a model for enterprise reporting.

Challenges and Lessons Learned

Hervé shared several challenges and insights from his journey:

• JDK Variability: Bytecode differs across major JDK versions, even for the same target. Always match the original JDK major version (e.g., JDK 8 for a Java 8 target).
• Environment Differences: Windows vs. Linux line endings (CRLF vs. LF) or file permissions (e.g., group write access) can break reproducibility. Docker ensures consistent environments.
• Plugin Issues: Older plugins introduced variability, but Hervé’s contributions have made modern versions reproducible.
• Unexpected Findings: Reproducible builds uncovered sensitive data in Maven Central artifacts, highlighting the need for careful build hygiene.

One surprising lesson came from file permissions: Hervé discovered that newer Linux distributions default to non-writable group permissions, unlike older ones, requiring adjustments to build recipes.

Interactive Learning: The Quiz

Hervé ended with a fun quiz to test the audience’s understanding, presenting rebuild results and asking, “Reproducible or not?” Examples included:

• Case 1: A Maven Javadoc Plugin 3.5.0 build matched the reference perfectly (reproducible).
• Case 2: A build showed bytecode differences due to a JDK mismatch (JDK 11 vs. JDK 8, not reproducible).
• Case 3: A build differed only in file permissions (group write access), fixable by adjusting the environment (reproducible with a corrected recipe).

The quiz reinforced a key point: reproducibility requires precise environment matching, but tools like diffoscope make debugging straightforward.

Getting Started

Ready to make your Maven builds reproducible? Follow these steps:

1. Clone reproducible-central and explore Hervé’s scripts and stats.
2. Run mvn artifact:check-buildplan to identify and upgrade non-reproducible plugins.
3. Set project.build.outputTimestamp in your POM file to fix JAR timestamps.
4. Test locally with mvn verify and artifact:compare, specifying your repository if needed.
5. Scale up using rebuild.sh and Docker for consistent environments, adapting to your internal repository.

Hervé encourages feedback to improve his tools, so if you hit issues, reach out via the project’s GitHub or Apache’s community channels.

Conclusion

Reproducible builds with Maven are not only achievable but transformative, offering security, trust, and operational benefits. Hervé Boutemy’s work demystifies the process, providing tools, scripts, and a clear roadmap to success. From preventing backdoors to catching configuration errors and sensitive data leaks, reproducible builds are a must-have for modern Java development.

Start small with artifact:check-buildplan, test locally, and scale with reproducible-central. As Hervé’s 3,500+ rebuilds show, the Java community is well on its way to making reproducibility the norm. Join the movement, and let’s build software we can trust!

Resources

• Reproducible Builds Official Website
• Reproducible Central GitHub Repository
• Maven Artifact Plugin
• Diffoscope Documentation
• SLSA Framework

Introduction

In a recent presentation at a Paris JUG event, Bruce Bujon, an R&D Engineer at Datadog and an open-source developer, delivered an insightful talk on instrumenting Java applications with OpenTelemetry. This powerful observability framework is transforming how developers monitor and analyze application performance, infrastructure, and security. In this detailed post, we’ll explore the key concepts from Bruce’s presentation, breaking down OpenTelemetry, its components, and practical steps to implement it in Java applications.

What is OpenTelemetry?

OpenTelemetry is an open-source observability framework designed to collect, process, and export telemetry data in a vendor-agnostic manner. It captures data from various sources—such as virtual machines, databases, and applications—and exports it to observability backends for analysis. Importantly, OpenTelemetry focuses solely on data collection and management, leaving visualization and analysis to backend tools like Datadog, Jaeger, or Grafana.

The framework supports three primary signals:

• Traces: These map the journey of requests through an application, highlighting the time taken by each component or microservice.
• Logs: Timestamped events, such as user actions or system errors, familiar to most developers.
• Metrics: Aggregated numerical data, like request rates, error counts, or CPU usage over time.

In his talk, Bruce focused on traces, which are particularly valuable for understanding performance bottlenecks in distributed systems.

Why Use OpenTelemetry for Java Applications?

For Java developers, OpenTelemetry offers a standardized way to instrument applications, ensuring compatibility with various observability backends. Its flexibility allows developers to collect telemetry data without being tied to a specific tool, making it ideal for diverse tech stacks. Bruce highlighted its growing adoption, noting that OpenTelemetry is the second most active project in the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), behind only Kubernetes.

Instrumenting a Java Application: A Step-by-Step Guide

Bruce demonstrated three approaches to instrumenting Java applications with OpenTelemetry, using a simple example of two web services: an “Order” service and a “Storage” service. The goal was to trace a request from the Order service, which calls the Storage service to check stock levels for items like hats, bags, and socks.

Approach 1: Manual Instrumentation with OpenTelemetry API and SDK

The first approach involves manually instrumenting the application using the OpenTelemetry API and SDK. This method offers maximum control but requires significant development effort.

Steps:

1. Add Dependencies: Include the OpenTelemetry Bill of Materials (BOM) to manage library versions, along with the API, SDK, OTLP exporter, and semantic conventions.
2. Initialize the SDK: Set up a TracerProvider with a resource defining the service (e.g., “storage”) and attributes like service name and deployment environment.
3. Create a Tracer: Use the Tracer to generate spans for specific operations, such as a web route or internal method.
4. Instrument Routes: For each route or method, create a span using a SpanBuilder, set attributes (e.g., span kind as “server”), and mark the start and end of the span.
5. Export Data: Configure the SDK to export spans to an OpenTelemetry Collector via the OTLP protocol.

Example Output: Bruce showed a trace with two spans—one for the route and one for an internal method—displayed in Datadog’s APM view, with attributes like service name and HTTP method.

Pros: Fine-grained control over instrumentation.

Cons: Verbose and time-consuming, especially for large applications or libraries with private APIs.

Approach 2: Framework Support with Spring Boot

The second approach leverages framework-specific integrations, such as Spring Boot’s OpenTelemetry starter, to automate instrumentation.

Steps:

1. Add Spring Boot Starter: Include the OpenTelemetry starter, which bundles the API, SDK, exporter, and autoconfigure dependencies.
2. Configure Environment Variables: Set variables for the service name, OTLP endpoint, and other settings.
3. Run the Application: The starter automatically instruments web routes, capturing HTTP methods, routes, and response codes.

Example Output: Bruce demonstrated a trace for the Order service, with spans automatically generated for routes and tagged with HTTP metadata.

Pros: Minimal code changes and good generic instrumentation.

Cons: Limited customization and varying support across frameworks (e.g., Spring Boot doesn’t support JDBC out of the box).

Approach 3: Auto-Instrumentation with JVM Agent

The third and most powerful approach uses the OpenTelemetry JVM agent for automatic instrumentation, requiring minimal code changes.

Steps:

1. Add the JVM Agent: Attach the OpenTelemetry Java agent to the JVM using a command-line option (e.g., -javaagent:opentelemetry-javaagent.jar).
2. Configure Environment Variables: Use autoconfigure variables (around 80 options) to customize the agent’s behavior.
3. Remove Manual Instrumentation: Eliminate SDK, exporter, and framework dependencies, keeping only the API and semantic conventions for custom instrumentation.
4. Run the Application: The agent instruments web servers, clients, and libraries (e.g., JDBC, Kafka) at runtime.

Example Output: Bruce showcased a complete distributed trace, including spans for both services, web clients, and servers, with context propagation handled automatically.

Pros: Comprehensive instrumentation with minimal effort, supporting over 100 libraries.

Cons: Potential conflicts with other JVM agents (e.g., security tools) and limited support for native images (e.g., Quarkus).

Context Propagation: Linking Traces Across Services

A critical aspect of distributed tracing is context propagation, ensuring that spans from different services are linked within a single trace. Bruce explained that without propagation, the Order and Storage services generated separate traces.

To address this, OpenTelemetry uses HTTP headers (e.g., W3C’s traceparent and tracestate) to carry tracing context. In the manual approach, Bruce implemented a RestTemplate interceptor in Spring to inject headers and a Quarkus filter to extract them. The JVM agent, however, handles this automatically, simplifying the process.

Additional Considerations

• Baggage: In response to an audience question, Bruce clarified that OpenTelemetry’s baggage feature allows propagating business-specific metadata across services, complementing tracing context.
• Cloud-Native Support: While cloud providers like AWS Lambda have proprietary monitoring solutions, their native support for OpenTelemetry varies. Bruce suggested further exploration for specific use cases like batch jobs or serverless functions.
• Performance: The JVM agent modifies bytecode at runtime, which may impact startup time but generally has negligible runtime overhead.

Conclusion

OpenTelemetry is a game-changer for Java developers seeking to enhance application observability. As Bruce demonstrated, it offers three flexible approaches—manual instrumentation, framework support, and auto-instrumentation—catering to different needs and expertise levels. The JVM agent stands out for its ease of use and comprehensive coverage, making it an excellent starting point for teams new to OpenTelemetry.

To get started, add the OpenTelemetry Java agent to your application with a single command-line option and configure it via environment variables. This minimal setup allows you to immediately observe your application’s behavior and assess OpenTelemetry’s value for your team.

The code and slides from Bruce’s presentation are available on GitHub, providing a practical reference for implementing OpenTelemetry in your projects. Whether you’re monitoring microservices or monoliths, OpenTelemetry empowers you to gain deep insights into your applications’ performance and behavior.

Resources

• OpenTelemetry Official Website
• OpenTelemetry Java GitHub Repository
• Spring Boot OpenTelemetry Starter
• Datadog APM for OpenTelemetry

Lors de Devoxx France 2023, Hila Fish a présenté une conférence captivante de 47 minutes intitulée « Incident Management – Talk the Talk, Walk the Walk » (lien YouTube), proposant une feuille de route pour une gestion efficace des incidents. Enregistrée en avril 2023 au Palais des Congrès à Paris, Hila, ingénieure DevOps senior chez Wix (site Wix), a partagé ses 15 années d’expérience dans la tech, mettant en avant des stratégies proactives et des processus structurés pour gérer les incidents en production. Son discours, enrichi de conseils pratiques et d’anecdotes réelles, a inspiré les participants à non seulement parler de gestion des incidents, mais à exceller dans ce domaine. Cet article explore le cadre de Hila, soulignant comment se préparer et résoudre les incidents tout en préservant la valeur business et le sommeil.

Repenser les incidents avec une mentalité business

Hila a commencé par redéfinir la perception des incidents, incitant à passer d’une vision technique étroite à une approche orientée business. Elle a défini les incidents comme des événements risquant des pertes de revenus, l’insatisfaction des clients, des violations de données ou des atteintes à la réputation, les distinguant des alertes mineures. Sans une gestion adéquate, les incidents peuvent entraîner des temps d’arrêt, une productivité réduite et des violations des accords de niveau de service (SLA), coûteux pour les entreprises. Hila a insisté sur le fait que les développeurs et ingénieurs doivent comprendre le « pourquoi » de leurs systèmes — comment les pannes affectent les revenus, les clients et la réputation.

Citants Werner Vogels, CTO d’AWS, Hila a rappelé que « tout échoue tout le temps », des systèmes de production à l’endurance humaine. Cette réalité rend les incidents inévitables, non des urgences à paniquer. En anticipant les échecs, les équipes peuvent aborder les incidents calmement, armées d’un processus structuré. La mentalité business de Hila encourage les ingénieurs à prioriser les résultats alignés sur les objectifs organisationnels, comme minimiser les temps d’arrêt et maintenir la confiance des clients. Cette perspective pose les bases de son cadre structuré de gestion des incidents, conçu pour éviter le chaos et optimiser l’efficacité.

Un processus structuré pour la résolution des incidents

Hila a présenté un processus en cinq piliers pour gérer les incidents, adapté du cadre de PagerDuty mais affiné par son expérience : Identifier et Catégoriser, Notifier et Escalader, Investiguer et Diagnostiquer, Résoudre et Récupérer, et Clôture de l’Incident. Chaque pilier inclut des questions clés pour guider les ingénieurs vers la résolution.

• Identifier et Catégoriser : Hila conseille d’évaluer l’ampleur et l’impact business de l’incident. Des questions comme « Est-ce que je comprends toute l’étendue du problème ? » et « Peut-on attendre les heures ouvrables ? » déterminent l’urgence. Si une alerte provient d’une plainte client plutôt que d’outils comme PagerDuty, cela signale une lacune dans la détection à corriger après l’incident.

• Notifier et Escalader : La communication est cruciale. Hila a souligné l’importance de notifier les équipes de support, les ingénieurs clients et les équipes dépendantes pour maintenir la transparence et respecter les SLA. Les alertes mal classifiées doivent être ajustées pour refléter la véritable gravité.

• Investiguer et Diagnostiquer : Concentrez-vous sur les informations pertinentes pour éviter de perdre du temps. Hila a partagé un exemple où des ingénieurs débattaient de détails de flux non pertinents, retardant la résolution. Poser « Ai-je trouvé la cause racine ? » assure la progression, avec une escalade si l’investigation stagne.

• Résoudre et Récupérer : La solution la plus rapide préservant la stabilité du système est idéale. Hila a mis en garde contre les correctifs « rapides et sales », comme redémarrer un service sans traiter les causes sous-jacentes, qui peuvent réapparaître et nuire à la fiabilité. Des correctifs permanents et des mesures préventives sont essentiels.

• Clôture de l’Incident : Après résolution, informez toutes les parties prenantes, vérifiez les alertes, mettez à jour les runbooks et évaluez si un post-mortem est nécessaire. Hila a insisté sur la documentation immédiate des leçons pour capturer les détails avec précision, favorisant une culture d’apprentissage sans blâme.

Ce processus structuré réduit le temps moyen de résolution, minimise les coûts et améliore la fiabilité des systèmes, en phase avec la philosophie business de Hila.

Traits essentiels des gestionnaires d’incidents

Hila a détaillé dix traits cruciaux pour une gestion efficace des incidents, proposant des moyens pratiques de les développer :

• Réflexion rapide : Les incidents impliquent souvent des problèmes inconnus, nécessitant des décisions rapides et créatives. Hila a suggéré de s’entraîner via des sessions de brainstorming ou des exercices d’équipe comme le paintball pour renforcer l’adaptabilité.

• Filtrer les informations pertinentes : Connaître les flux d’un système aide à distinguer les données critiques du bruit. La familiarité avec l’architecture système améliore cette compétence, accélérant le débogage.

• Travailler sous pression : Hila a raconté l’histoire d’un collègue paralysé par 300 alertes lors de son premier quart d’astreinte. Collecter des données pertinentes réduit le stress en restaurant le contrôle. Apprendre les flux système en amont renforce la confiance.

• Travail méthodique : Suivre son processus basé sur les piliers assure une progression constante, même sous pression.

• Humilité : Demander de l’aide privilégie les besoins business à l’ego. Hila a encouragé l’escalade des problèmes non résolus plutôt que de perdre du temps.

• Résolution de problèmes et attitude proactive : Une approche positive et proactive favorise les solutions. Hila a raconté avoir poussé des collègues réticents à essayer des correctifs suggérés, évitant la stagnation.

• Propriété et initiative : Même après escalade, les gestionnaires doivent vérifier la progression, comme Hila l’a fait en relançant un DBA silencieux.

• Communication : Des mises à jour claires et concises aux équipes et clients sont vitales. Pour les moins communicatifs, Hila a recommandé des lignes directrices prédéfinies pour les canaux et le contenu.

• Leadership sans autorité : La confiance et le calme inspirent la confiance, permettant aux gestionnaires de diriger efficacement les équipes.

• Engagement : La passion pour le rôle stimule la propriété et l’initiative. Hila a averti que l’apathie pourrait signaler un épuisement ou un mauvais ajustement professionnel.

Ces traits, affinés par la pratique et la réflexion, permettent aux ingénieurs de gérer les incidents avec clarté et détermination.

Préparation proactive pour réussir ses incidents

Le message central de Hila était le pouvoir de la proactivité, comparé à une écoute active en classe pour préparer un examen. Elle a détaillé des étapes proactives pour le travail quotidien et les actions post-incident pour garantir la preparedness :

• Actions post-incident : Rédigez des rapports de fin de quart d’astreinte pour documenter les problèmes récurrents, utiles pour la sensibilisation de l’équipe et les audits. Notez immédiatement les observations pour un post-mortem, même sans réunion formelle, pour capturer les leçons. Ouvrez des tâches pour prévenir les futurs incidents, corrigez les alertes faussement positives, mettez à jour les runbooks et automatisez les problèmes auto-réparables. Partagez des connaissances détaillées via des manuels ou des briefings pour aider les équipes à apprendre des processus de débogage.

• Proactivité quotidienne : Lisez les rapports de fin de quart des coéquipiers pour rester informé des changements en production. Connaissez les contacts d’escalade pour d’autres domaines (par exemple, développeurs pour des services spécifiques) pour éviter les retards. Étudiez l’architecture système et les flux d’applications pour identifier les points faibles et rationaliser le dépannage. Surveillez les tâches des coéquipiers et les changements en production pour anticiper les impacts. Soyez une personne ressource, partageant vos connaissances pour bâtir la confiance et réduire les efforts de collecte d’informations.

L’approche proactive de Hila garantit que les ingénieurs sont « prêts ou non » lorsque les alertes de PagerDuty ou OpsGenie arrivent, minimisant les temps d’arrêt et favorisant le succès business.

Conclusion

La présentation de Hila Fish à Devoxx France 2023 a été une masterclass en gestion des incidents, mêlant processus structurés, traits essentiels et stratégies proactives. En adoptant une mentalité business, en suivant un cadre de résolution clair, en cultivant des compétences clés et en se préparant avec diligence, les ingénieurs peuvent transformer les incidents chaotiques en défis gérables. Son accent sur la préparation et la collaboration garantit des résolutions efficaces tout en préservant le sommeil — une victoire pour les ingénieurs et les entreprises.

Visionnez la conférence complète sur YouTube pour explorer davantage les idées de Hila. Son travail chez Wix (site Wix) reflète un engagement envers l’excellence DevOps, et des ressources supplémentaires sont disponibles via Devoxx France (site Devoxx France). Comme Hila l’a rappelé, maîtriser la gestion des incidents signifie se préparer, rester calme et toujours prioriser le business — car lorsque les incidents frappent, vous serez prêt à agir.